Constants that presently appear arbitrary may eventually be derived from a deeper theory. What looks like a freely adjustable number today might turn out to be fixed by more fundamental physics.
If a future theory showed that the relevant constants could not have taken other values, some apparent examples of fine-tuning would change substantially. Instead of asking why a particular value was selected from many possibilities, we would ask why the deeper laws have the form they do.
This possibility should remain open. Scientific history contains many examples in which a deeper theory explained relationships that previously seemed independent.
However, appealing to an undiscovered future theory is not itself an explanation of the present evidence. Until such a theory exists, we should distinguish what current physics actually derives from what future physics might eventually explain.
A deeper theory could also move rather than eliminate the question if that theory itself requires special laws, boundary conditions, or structures.
Will a more fundamental theory eliminate the apparent freedom in the constants, or will it reveal a deeper level at which the same question about life-permitting order remains?