Nature produces organized structures without intelligent intervention. Lipids can assemble into membranes. Molecules can form ordered structures. Chemical networks can display feedback and autocatalytic behavior.
If information-processing systems can likewise emerge through self-organization, does this remove the need for a design explanation?
Self-organization provides a genuine natural mechanism rather than merely a promise that an explanation will someday be found.
Some origin models specifically attempt to explain how mutually dependent information-bearing molecules and catalysts could develop together. Such proposals deserve to be evaluated on their actual explanatory power.
Self-assembly and self-organization occur naturally at many levels of chemistry and biology.
Researchers have also developed theoretical models in which interacting genes, replicators, catalysts, and primitive translation systems reinforce one another. These models attempt to show how coding could emerge gradually rather than requiring a complete modern translation system to appear at once.
This is important because components that depend upon one another today need not necessarily have originated independently in their modern forms.
However, spontaneous order and biological information are not automatically the same thing. The relevant question is whether self-organizing processes can establish the sequence-specific relationships, heredity, functional effects, and fidelity needed for cumulative biological evolution.
Intelligent Design should therefore distinguish ordinary molecular organization from the particular organization found in biological information processing. The existence of self-organization does not by itself establish either design or non-design.
Can experimentally realistic prebiotic systems undergo the proposed transition?
How readily can self-organizing systems generate stable coding relationships rather than transient molecular order?
Can they develop sufficient heredity and translation accuracy for cumulative evolution?
How closely do theoretical models correspond to the actual history of early life?