The debate cannot be resolved merely by pointing to the complexity of a molecular machine, nor by showing that some of its components have evolutionary relatives. Both observations matter, but they address different parts of the question.
A satisfactory evolutionary explanation should identify plausible precursors, functional intermediate stages, mechanisms of change, and evidence connecting those stages. A satisfactory design argument should identify positive characteristics of intelligent causation rather than depend only upon gaps in an evolutionary reconstruction.
Studies of the bacterial flagellum provide a useful test case. Comparative genomics identifies relationships among flagellar components and other systems, and researchers have proposed histories involving duplication, modification, and co-option. At the same time, the flagellum remains a highly integrated system whose assembly, regulation, energy use, and function require extensive coordination.
Ancient evolutionary histories cannot normally be replayed directly. Proposed pathways vary in evidential support, and incomplete reconstruction does not by itself establish design. Conversely, identifying homologous components does not by itself provide a complete historical account of how an integrated machine arose.
What evidence would allow us to distinguish an evolutionary pathway that is merely possible from one that is historically well supported, and what positive evidence would justify adding intelligent causation to the explanation?
A Visit With Jesus considers molecular machinery an important part of the design question because cells contain extraordinary functional organization. We should acknowledge demonstrated evolutionary mechanisms and proposed historical pathways while still asking whether those mechanisms provide an adequate explanation for the origin of the coordinated systems themselves.