The term "molecular machine" is not merely an analogy used by Intelligent Design advocates. Molecular biologists routinely describe large protein assemblies in mechanical and functional terms because their components interact in organized ways to accomplish particular tasks.
ATP synthase rotates while coupling an ion gradient to ATP production. Motor proteins transport cargo through cells. Ribosomes coordinate the translation of genetic information into proteins. Other complexes fold, inspect, transport, and degrade cellular components.
The evidence examined here includes ATP synthase, kinesin and dynein, the ribosome, molecular chaperones, the proteasome, and the bacterial flagellum. These systems differ greatly in structure and function, but each depends upon coordinated interactions among multiple molecular components.
Modern cell biology therefore presents the cell not simply as a collection of independent chemical reactions but as an organized system containing interacting molecular assemblies.
Calling something a machine does not establish that it was intelligently designed. Machine terminology describes organization and function. It does not by itself identify the origin of that organization.
What features of molecular machinery can be explained by chemistry and evolutionary history, and which features, if any, require an additional explanation?
Intelligent Design should not infer design merely from the word "machine." The design question concerns the origin of the functional organization, coordination, and information required to produce and integrate these molecular systems.