Not every unlikely or orderly feature requires intelligence. Some structures arise because physical laws strongly constrain what can occur. Other events may be improbable individually but become possible when many opportunities exist.
Selection effects also matter. Observers necessarily find themselves in conditions compatible with observers. In biology, natural selection preserves variations that improve reproduction, allowing functional organization to accumulate without foresight.
Physics provides many examples of spontaneous order. Chemistry can produce complex structures without intelligence. Evolutionary biology documents natural selection acting on inherited variation. Discussions of cosmic fine-tuning also consider anthropic selection and multiverse proposals as alternatives to design.
Chance, necessity, and selection are broad categories rather than complete explanations by themselves. Their adequacy must be evaluated for the particular phenomenon under investigation.
Appealing to many possible universes or histories may alter probability assessments, but such proposals also raise questions about the underlying system capable of producing those possibilities.
Which features follow naturally from physical necessity? Which have plausible probabilistic explanations? Where does selection operate, and what must already exist before selection can begin?
A design argument becomes stronger when it distinguishes phenomena that natural processes explain well from those for which chance, necessity, and selection appear insufficient. Design should not be inferred merely because an event is unusual.