Living systems use feedback mechanisms in which information about the state of a system influences processes that regulate that state.
How do feedback mechanisms allow living systems to regulate themselves, and what can their organization tell us about biological design?
Cells and organisms continually adjust their activities in response to changing internal and external conditions. In many cases, the result of a process influences the activity of the process itself.
Negative feedback can stabilize a system around a functional range, while positive feedback can amplify changes or help produce transitions between biological states. Feedback occurs in gene regulation, metabolism, signaling, development, physiology, and behavior.
Feedback is important because it allows biological systems to respond dynamically rather than operate as fixed chains of chemical reactions.
Feedback regulation is widespread in living systems. Specific molecular mechanisms have been identified in which sensors, signaling pathways, regulatory molecules, and effectors participate in feedback loops.
Systems biology and control theory provide mathematical frameworks for describing how feedback produces stability, adaptation, oscillation, switching, and other biological behaviors.
Individual feedback loops can often be described in detail, while the behavior of large interconnected regulatory networks can be considerably more difficult to predict.
Feedback systems resemble control strategies used in engineering, but similarity of organization does not by itself establish a common origin. The design question concerns whether particular biological control architectures provide evidence of purposeful organization beyond the analogy itself.
Feedback control is a demonstrated and fundamental feature of biological organization. Its relevance to design should be assessed from the structure, integration, and origin of particular control systems rather than from terminology alone.