Evidence Record

Changes in Gene Regulation

Regulatory Evolution  •  Biological Innovation and Evolutionary Mechanisms
A Visit With Jesus

Biological traits can change when existing genes are expressed at different times, places, or levels without requiring the origin of entirely new proteins.

The Investigative Question

How much biological innovation can arise through changes in gene regulation?

What We Observe

Genes operate within regulatory systems that determine when, where, and how strongly they are expressed. Mutations in regulatory DNA or regulatory proteins can therefore alter traits without changing the coding sequence of the affected gene.

Scientific Background

Developmental and physiological differences can result from changes in promoters, enhancers, transcription factors, signaling pathways, and other regulatory elements.

Why It Matters

Regulatory evolution provides a mechanism for modifying existing biological systems by changing their deployment rather than inventing every component anew.

What Is Known

Regulatory mutations can produce substantial phenotypic effects. Empirical studies have identified cis-regulatory changes associated with differences in morphology, physiology, behavior, adaptation, and development. Regulatory changes can alter when, where, or how strongly an existing gene is expressed without changing the protein encoded by that gene.

What Is Proposed

Evolutionary developmental biology proposes that changes in gene regulation have contributed importantly to morphological diversification. Some researchers have argued that cis-regulatory changes make a particularly important or predominant contribution to the evolution of form, while others argue that the evidence supports substantial roles for both regulatory and protein-coding changes.

What Remains Uncertain

For ancient developmental innovations, identifying the exact regulatory changes and reconstructing ancestral regulatory networks can be difficult. The relative contributions of regulatory changes and protein-coding changes also vary among traits and remain difficult to generalize across the history of life.

Design Relevance

Regulatory change is relevant to Intelligent Design because major phenotypic differences need not require entirely new proteins. At the same time, regulatory explanations depend upon the existence and organization of the systems being regulated.

Assessment

Changes in gene regulation are a demonstrated source of biological variation and innovation. They show that important phenotypic changes can occur by altering the deployment of existing genes rather than by changing every protein involved. Their contribution to particular major innovations should be evaluated alongside changes in protein-coding genes and the origin and organization of the underlying developmental systems.

Research Sources

Wray — Evolutionary Significance of Cis-Regulatory Mutations
Gregory A. Wray • Nature Reviews Genetics • 2007
Use: Scientific Foundation
Relevance: Provides broad empirical evidence that mutations in cis-regulatory DNA can alter gene expression and produce significant phenotypic changes.
DOI: 10.1038/nrg2063
Prud'homme et al. — Emerging Principles of Regulatory Evolution
Benjamin Prud'homme; Nicolas Gompel; Sean B. Carroll • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences • 2007
Use: Regulatory Mechanisms
Relevance: Examines how changes in cis-regulatory elements can alter the developmental deployment of existing genes and contribute to morphological differences.
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0700488104
Hoekstra and Coyne — The Locus of Evolution
Hopi E. Hoekstra; Jerry A. Coyne • Evolution • 2007
Use: Scientific Qualification
Relevance: Evaluates claims about the relative importance of regulatory and protein-coding mutations in adaptation.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00105.x