Bible Dictionary

Anammelech

God • Old Testament
A Visit With Jesus
  Back to Dictionary Search
Anammelech was a deity worshiped by the people of Sepharvaim, who were settled in Samaria. Scripture says that the worship of this god involved burning children in the fire.

Definition

Anammelech was a deity worshiped by the Sepharvites, a people settled in Samaria. The name is explained as “Anu is king.” The sources describe Anammelech as a companion deity to Adrammelech and associate the worship of both with sacrifice by fire.

Biblical Usage

The people of Sepharvaim burned their children in the fire to Adrammelech and Anammelech. Scripture presents this worship as part of the religious practices of the colonists placed in Samaria.

Historical Background

Anammelech is described as a Babylonian deity, though the identification of Sepharvaim and the precise origin of the worship are disputed in the supplied material. The sources also note that sacrifice by fire was prevalent in Syria.

Scripture References

Historical Bible Dictionaries

Easton's Bible Dictionary
One of the gods worshipped by the people of Sepharvaim, who colonized Samaria (2 Kings 17:31). The name means “Anu is king.” It was a female deity representing the moon, as Adrammelech (q.v.) was the male representing the sun.
Smith's Bible Dictionary
(image of the king), one of the idols worshipped by the colonists introduced into Samaria from Sepharvaim. (2 Kings 17:31) He was worshipped with rites resembling those of Molech, and is the companion-god to Adrammelech.
International Standard Bible Encyclopedia (ISBE)
<p>a-nam'-e-lek (`anammelekh = Assyrian Anu-malik, "Anu is the prince"): A Babylonian (?) deity worshipped by the Sepharvites in Samaria, after being transported there by Sargon. The worship of Adrammelech (who is mentioned with Anammelech) and Anammelech is accompanied by the sacrifice of children by fire: "The Sepharvites burnt their children in the fire to Adrammelech and Anammelech, the gods of Sepharvaim" (2Ki 17:31). This passage presents two grave difficulties. First, there is no evidence in cuneiform literature that would point to the presence of human sacrifice, by fire or otherwise, as part of the ritual; nor has it been shown that the sculptures or bas-reliefs deny this thesis.</p><p>Much depends upon the identification of "Sepharvaim"; if, as some scholars hold, Sepharvaim and Sippar are one and the same cities, the two deities referred to are Babylonian. But there are several strong objections to this theory. It has been suggested that Sepharvaim (Septuagint, seppharin, sepphareimi) is rather identical with "Shabara'in," a city mentioned in the Babylonian Chronicle as having been destroyed by Shalmaneser IV. As Sepharvaim and Arpad and Hamath are grouped together (2Ki 17:24; 18:34) in two passages, it is probable that Sepharvaim is a Syriac city. Sepharvaim may then be another form of "Shabara'in," which, in turn, is the Assyrian form of Sibraim (Eze 47:16), a city in the neighborhood of Damascus (of Halevy, ZA, II, 401 ff). One objection to this last is the necessity for representing "c" by "sh"; this is not necessarily insurmountable, however. Then, the attempt to find an Assyrian etymology for the two god-names falls to the ground. Besides, the custom of sacrifice by fire was prevalent in Syria. Secondly, the god that was worshipped at Sippar was neither Adrammelech nor Anammelech but Samas. It is improbable, as some would urge, that Adrammelech is a secondary title of the tutelary god of Sippar; then it would have to be shown that Anu enjoyed special reverence in this city which was especially consecrated to the worship of the Sun-god. (For "Anu" see ASSYRIA.) It may be that the text is corrupt. See also ADRAMMELECH.</p><p>H. J. Wolf</p>
  Back to Dictionary Search